Polypectomy Hot Snare
Product Sterilization Information: The device is sterilized by EO. Do not re-sterilize
Validity: 2 years.

Pic.1. Cutting Loop Shape

|
Loop Shape |
Model No. |
Sheath O.D (mm) |
Loop Width (mm) |
Working Length (mm) |
|
Ellipse (E type) |
ES18-E1810/2400 |
Φ1.8 |
10 |
2400 |
|
ES18-E1815/2400 |
Φ1.8 |
15 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-E1810/1800 |
Φ1.8 |
10 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-E1815/1800 |
Φ1.8 |
15 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-E2410/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
10 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-E2415/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
15 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-E2410/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
10 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-E2415/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
15 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-E2425/1600 |
Φ2.4 |
25 |
1600 |
|
|
ES18-E2425/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
25 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-E2432/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-E2425/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
25 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-E2432/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
1800 |
|
|
Hexagonal (H type) |
ES18-H2410/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
10 |
2400 |
|
ES18-H2415/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
15 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-H2422/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
22 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-H2432/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-H2410/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
10 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-H2415/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
15 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-H2422/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
22 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-H2432/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
1800 |
|
|
Crescent (C type) |
ES18-C2415/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
15 |
2400 |
|
ES18-C2425/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
25 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-C2432/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
2400 |
|
|
ES18-C2415/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
15 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-C2425/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
25 |
1800 |
|
|
ES18-C2432/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
1800 |
|
|
Round (R Type) |
ES18-R2432/2400 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
2400 |
|
ES18-R2432/1800 |
Φ2.4 |
32 |
1800 |
Rotation function improves polyp retrieval efficiency.
A variety of different shapes and different specifications are suitable for different clinical needs.
Using nickel-titanium alloy wire, it is suitable for the treatment of complex location lesions, and it is not deformed after being bent for many times.
Coil hardness is moderate, recovery is good, easy to open and close.

In recent years, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has increasingly been used over hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for the removal of colorectal polyps (4 – 10 mm in size). However, the optimal technique (CSP vs. HSP), in terms of complete polyp resection and complications, is uncertain. Our aim was to compare incomplete resection rate (IRR) of polyps and complications using CSP vs. HSP.
The current European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines recommend CSP as the preferred technique for removal of diminutive polyps (size ≤ 5 mm) due to high rates of complete resection, adequate tissue sampling for histology, and low complication rates 18. They also suggest CSP for sessile polyps 6 – 9 mm in size because of its superior safety profile, although evidence comparing efficacy with HSP is lacking 18.
Recently, randomized controlled studies (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of HSP with CSP for colorectal polyps ranging between 4 and 10 mm with a disparity in results 19 20 21 . Given this discrepancy and the lack of supporting evidence for current guidelines for polypectomy, we performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of available evidence with the objective to compare the IRR and adverse events between CSP and HSP when removing polyps between 4 and 10 mm in size.
Hot Tags: polypectomy hot snare, China polypectomy hot snare manufacturers, suppliers, Hot Polypectomy Snare, Rotatable Single-Use Polypectomy Snare, Disposable Polypectomy Snare, Disposable Polypectomy Snare Oval, Polypectomy Hot Snare
You Might Also Like
Send Inquiry











